Discussion about this post

User's avatar
RandomSyllables's avatar

I am also wondering about why the editors allowed such a disparity get past them. I would find that very disappointing and jarring as well. I admit, I have not read a lot of collaborative works. Although, I did almost start writing one with a friend of mine. However I would have been the lead writer, while she did a lot of the world building. Alas, we drifted before realizing our dreams.

To be fair, we were teenagers to young adults.

I have found a lot of first person stories risk coming out flat when they want it to be accessible to people who want to 'self insert'. Since I do not do this, I read stories because I am interested in characterization, I find it off-putting.

Kayleigh Thorpe's avatar

Love it. Aahhh! \o/

I think it's a risk to joint publish anything (this coming from me of all people enjoys a colab) but from side of things it's a contrast someone's more polished nuance alongside my often let's vomit on a page and try and make sense of everything.

But that's for here. For something commercial and published I think it'd need more then a vibe approach. It's a shame that the quality disparity undercut the ambition. Going under the assumption it was run past an editor do you think they were aware of the dichotomy or just went well ball

4 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?